Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
2017-10-12 10:17 GMT+02:00 Robert Altnoeder <robert.altnoeder at linbit.com>: > While it is not "bad", it limits the system to an active-passive cluster > configuration, because all logical volumes must be active on the same node. > The standard setup that we teach in our trainings, that we commonly > install and use ourselves and that all of our automated provisioning > software uses is storage -> LVM -> DRBD, or storage -> ZFS -> DRBD, as > this allows the configuration of multiple independent resources, where > each resource can be active on any of the nodes, thereby also allowing > the creation of active-active clusters. Ok, but I have to create just a simple NFS server, which advantage should I get creating multiple resources ? I would be still forced to an active-passive cluster, as only one NFS server can be used at the same time