Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On 12 Oct 2017 5:10 am, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" < gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: Previously i've asked about DRBDv9+ZFS. Let's assume a more "standard" setup with DRBDv8 + mdadm. What I would like to archieve is a simple redundant SAN. (anything preconfigured for this ?) Which is best, raid1+drbd+lvm or drbd+raid1+lvm? Any advantage by creating multiple drbd resources ? I think that a single DRBD resource is better for administrative point of view. A simple failover would be enough, I don't need master-master In that case you might go with raid -> lvm -> drbd -> lvm to benefit from lvm in both layers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20171012/6bb3449c/attachment.htm>