Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Philipp Reisner wrote: >> > This is intended to be the final RC. It is inteded to build and work >> > on RHEL 5.x (where x >= 3), RHEL 6.x, SELS11SPx, Debian 6, Debian 5 >> > with backports kernels, Ubuntu 10.04. >> > >> > I think all the issues reported for rc3 where fixed. Please provide >> > testing and feedback. >> >> Will you provide answers then to these feedbacks? Sorry but I posted >> two times in /dev/null about panic in RH EL 5.6 environments... >> Gianluca > > Sorry, that we do not answer all posts on drbd-user always. > > I just looked at your post form June 24. The OOPS in > drbd_remove_interval has been fixed. It is mentioned as > > * Fixed OOPS on RHEL5 kernels; By delivering a workaround for a bug in > RHEL5's header files > > So, yes. The issue you struggled with, has been fixed. > > Best, > Phil I confirm that the rpm builds correctly on my CentOS x86 with kernel 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 and now I don't get the panic when running mkfs on top of drbd0. Thanks. Next step I will try the multiple replicated volume feature in single connection... Any ETA about final date ? Would you suggest 8.4 for a pacemaker cluster based on CentOS 5.6 (or perhaps 6.1) that could go to production on September? Or generally you sugegst to adopt X.Y.Z version when Z is greater than a certain number > 0? BTW: if you take the time to see my previous post on rc1 at http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2011-June/016266.html and give a feedback about my comments on doc section about rpm build stage it would be great. Gianluca