Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lovely! That's what I want to hear: "Rock solid"... :D I've got slackware 12.1. (compared to 12.0 SW states that this was a "must have" upgrade, and I trusted that). Anyway, I agree. I don't like using 2.6.24, I'd rather be using 2.4.x even. I'll check if I can downgrade the kernel a bit. Maybe downgrade everything a bit. I've never seen so many problems with a Linux system before. But then again, this is the first time using 2.6.x in production... ;) Basicly this problem with new versions is all 'cos of the "new" hardware not supported in older version. If it's at all possible I will follow your recomendation and downgrade to 2.6.9... Thanks! /Stefan ---------- Original Message ----------- From: David Coulson <david at davidcoulson.net> To: Stefan Löfgren <stlo at dontdownload.com> Cc: drbd-user at linbit.com Sent: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:19:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Downgrading? > Stefan Löfgren wrote: > > Any suggestions on what I should do? Downgrade to DRBD 8.0.12? Will this make > > it better? Known issues? Known issues together with VMWare? Will rc2 make a > > difference? Anyone else been running 2.6.24.x and DRBD 8.2.x with success > > (DELL PowerEdge R200)? Maybe even kernel problems? > What distribution are you running? Many maintain a stable kernel > branch which has all the hardware support you need, along with > current security patches and bug fixes. I'd never consider running > 2.6.25 on a production box. I typically run RHEL4's 2.6.9 kernel on > systems in my environment, and DRBD is rock solid (8.2.something). > > David ------- End of Original Message -------