Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
>Maurice Volaski wrote: >> No, this would not work. Bonding is not routing. There was once a >> discussion here on how this could be accomplished a long while ago using >> OSPF. It is rather complex. I seem to recall, however, that DRBD+, the >> commercial version, can do this natively. Correct? > >Did you read my previous post ? > Did you read mine? I said: "This wouldn't work if the NICs are on different networks, which is what you'd want to also establish redundancy against switch failure. Heartbeat, however, has had this ability for a long time, although that's a way simpler connection." > >bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.10 on box 1 >bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.20 on box 2 > >Where is the routing problem ? Where's the second network? -- Maurice Volaski, mvolaski at aecom.yu.edu Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University