Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Maurice Volaski wrote:
> No, this would not work. Bonding is not routing. There was once a
> discussion here on how this could be accomplished a long while ago using
> OSPF. It is rather complex. I seem to recall, however, that DRBD+, the
> commercial version, can do this natively. Correct?
Did you read my previous post ?
Box1 has
- eth0
- eth1
eth0 and eth1 are bonded into
- bond0
Box2 has
- eth0
- eth1
eth0 and eth1 are bonded into
- bond0
bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.10 on box 1
bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.20 on box 2
Where is the routing problem ?
Config file will just look like this:
on Inet-Primaire {
device /dev/drbd0;
disk /dev/md0;
address 192.168.1.10:7788;
flexible-meta-disk internal;
}
on Inet-Secondaire {
device /dev/drbd0;
disk /dev/md0;
address 192.168.1.20:7788;
meta-disk internal;
}
No ?