Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Maurice Volaski wrote: >> Maurice Volaski wrote: >>> No, this would not work. Bonding is not routing. There was once a >>> discussion here on how this could be accomplished a long while ago >>> using >>> OSPF. It is rather complex. I seem to recall, however, that DRBD+, the >>> commercial version, can do this natively. Correct? >> >> Did you read my previous post ? >> > > Did you read mine? I said: > > "This wouldn't work if the NICs are on different networks, which is what > you'd want to also establish redundancy against switch failure. > Heartbeat, however, has had this ability for a long time, although > that's a way simpler connection." Here is the question of the first post: I just want to build a redondancy between the 2 nics for the same drbd volume . If the link on the NIC A failed, i would like to use the NIC B in order to keep the synchronisation on the drbd volume. NIC redundancy, nothing else