Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hi, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Tothill" <Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk> > To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:42:54 AM > Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time > Are you using active/active channel bonding? If so I'd suggest trying > active/passive (or just a single direct connection with no bonding) > and see if that helps. If in doubt, simplify... > Incidentally, with gigE my experience is that you don't actually need > a 'crossover' cable to do direct connection, a normal 'straight' > cable works just as well. I think this is because gigE uses all 4 > pairs simultaneously in both directions rather than one pair in each > direction as 100M does. > Chris > --------------------------- > Christopher Tothill > Zone D Senior IT Support Specialist (Chemistry Unix Support) > W227, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol > Tel: (+44 117 33) 17045 > Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk > --------------------------- > On 27 June 2013 03:12, Gerald Brandt < gbr at majentis.com > wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'm running Intel e1000 with crossover cable, and I just noticed in > > my log files I'm getting this: > > > [3535162.766591] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down > > > [3535168.243278] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, > > Flow Control: Rx/Tx > > > [3535168.243282] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: 10/100 speed: disabling > > TSO > > > [3535176.574432] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down > > > [3535178.495165] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, > > Flow Control: Rx/Tx > > > [3535214.602022] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down > > > [3535214.602465] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: Reset adapter > > > [3535239.602540] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, > > Flow Control: Rx/Tx > > > Interesting. > > > Gerald > I'm sticking with active/passive, and a double of check of my cable shows it to be a regular one, nothing special about it. drbd0 pings/acks just fine, it's only drbd1 that fails, once or twice a day, at irregular times. Will it get worse if I add a third drbd resource to the same box? Gerald -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130627/cb8e6876/attachment.htm>