<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Hi,<br><br><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Chris Tothill" <Chris.Tothill@bristol.ac.uk><br><b>To: </b>drbd-user@lists.linbit.com<br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:42:54 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div>Are you using active/active channel bonding? If so I'd suggest trying active/passive (or just a single direct connection with no bonding) and see if that helps. If in doubt, simplify...<br><br></div>
<div>Incidentally, with gigE my experience is that you don't actually need a 'crossover' cable to do direct connection, a normal 'straight' cable works just as well. I think this is because gigE uses all 4 pairs simultaneously in both directions rather than one pair in each direction as 100M does.<br>
</div><div><br>Chris<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div>---------------------------</div><div>Christopher Tothill</div><div>Zone D Senior IT Support Specialist (Chemistry Unix Support)</div>
<div>W227, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol</div><div>Tel: (+44 117 33) 17045</div><div><a href="mailto:Chris.Tothill@bristol.ac.uk" target="_blank">Chris.Tothill@bristol.ac.uk</a></div><div>---------------------------</div>
</div>
<br><br><div id="DWT15007" class="gmail_quote">On 27 June 2013 03:12, Gerald Brandt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gbr@majentis.com" target="_blank">gbr@majentis.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I'm running Intel e1000 with crossover cable, and I just noticed in my log files I'm getting this:<br>
<br>
[3535162.766591] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down<br>
[3535168.243278] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx<br>
[3535168.243282] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO<br>
[3535176.574432] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down<br>
[3535178.495165] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx<br>
[3535214.602022] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down<br>
[3535214.602465] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: Reset adapter<br>
[3535239.602540] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx<br>
<br>
Interesting.<br>
<div id="DWT15006" class="im HOEnZb"><br>
Gerald<br>
<br><br></div></blockquote><br></div></div></blockquote>I'm sticking with active/passive, and a double of check of my cable shows it to be a regular one, nothing special about it.<br><br>drbd0 pings/acks just fine, it's only drbd1 that fails, once or twice a day, at irregular times. Will it get worse if I add a third drbd resource to the same box?<br><br>Gerald<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im HOEnZb"></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></body></html>