[DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time

Louis mailtolouis2020-forum at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 27 13:44:12 CEST 2013

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


Hi,

I don't think is related to bonding, I've tried that using just 1 NIC, and the problem still exist. Usually is those none active drbd partition will get disconnect/reconnect,so yes, the more partition you add the more you see.

By the way, Ubuntu 13.04 is using DRBD 8.4.2, not sure it will sync with 8.3.x or not.




>________________________________
> From: Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com>
>To: Chris Tothill <Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk> 
>Cc: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com 
>Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time
> 
>
>
>Hi,
>
>>________________________________
>
>From: "Chris Tothill" <Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk>
>>To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
>>Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:42:54 AM
>>Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time
>>
>>
>>Are you using active/active channel bonding? If so I'd suggest trying active/passive (or just a single direct connection with no bonding) and see if that helps. If in doubt, simplify...
>>
>>
>>Incidentally, with gigE my experience is that you don't actually need a 'crossover' cable to do direct connection, a normal 'straight' cable works just as well. I think this is because gigE uses all 4 pairs simultaneously in both directions rather than one pair in each direction as 100M does.
>>
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------
>>Christopher Tothill
>>Zone D Senior IT Support Specialist (Chemistry Unix Support)
>>W227, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol
>>Tel: (+44 117 33) 17045
>>Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk
>>---------------------------
>>
>>
>>On 27 June 2013 03:12, Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm running Intel e1000 with crossover cable, and I just noticed in my log files I'm getting this:
>>>
>>>[3535162.766591] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down
>>>[3535168.243278] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
>>>[3535168.243282] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
>>>[3535176.574432] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down
>>>[3535178.495165] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
>>>[3535214.602022] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down
>>>[3535214.602465] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: Reset adapter
>>>[3535239.602540] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
>>>
>>>Interesting.
>>>
>>>
>>>Gerald
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I'm sticking with active/passive, and a double of check of my cable shows it to be a regular one, nothing special about it.
>
>drbd0 pings/acks just fine, it's only drbd1 that fails, once or twice a day, at irregular times.  Will it get worse if I add a third drbd resource to the same box?
>
>Gerald
>
>_______________________________________________
>drbd-user mailing list
>drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
>http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130627/4c8241fc/attachment.htm>


More information about the drbd-user mailing list