Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:10:12PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
> On 22/02/16 11:59 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:04:36PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
> >> This software is purely for 8.4, so I am not worried about DRBD 9
> >> compatibility at this time.
> >>
> >> That said, I would rather not use it anyway, so if I can get the
> >> estimate resync time via another tool, I would prefer to do so.
> >
> > I don't think we have that readily available, really.
> > It is also a rough estimate anyways,
> > based on sampling the out-of-sync count,
> > guestimating a derivative, and extrapolating to zero...
> >
> > I still could put that in some connection/peer_device specific sysfs
> > or debugfs file.
> >
> > Lars
>
> If no one else has asked for this, don't worry about it. I am pretty
> sure that it is always 'hh:mm:ss', right? It never reports days?
Code reads:
seq_printf(seq, "finish: %lu:%02lu:%02lu",
rt / 3600, (rt % 3600) / 60, rt % 60);
That was a "Yes." ;-)
> Assuming so, I already went ahead and wrote a simple parser that does
> ((hh*3600) + (mm*60) + sec) and that's working well enough.
>
> Having this type of info (setup for parsing by programs) in sysfs for
> drbd 9 though would be a lovely feature to have. That is where we'll be
> focusing our long term efforts.