[DRBD-user] Uncatchable DRBD out-of-sync issue

Dan Barker dbarker at visioncomm.net
Mon Mar 25 15:50:32 CET 2013

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com [mailto:drbd-user-
> bounces at lists.linbit.com] On Behalf Of Stanislav German-Evtushenko
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:13 AM
> To: Radu Radutiu
> Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Uncatchable DRBD out-of-sync issue
> Thank you for suggestion.
> I could investigate if this is a swap region but it wouldn't help
> because:
> 1) I can check it for Linux VMs but I can't do the same for Windows
> ones (because swap file is in file system).
> 2) I can't do online migration even if only swap region is out of sync
> because it will make a VM unstable.
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Radu Radutiu <rradutiu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was asking if the out of sync blocks belong to a swap partition of
> one of
> > the virtual machines. I see exactly the same problem with a setup more
> or
> > less similar to your setup (my setup is an active-passive one, lvm on
> top
> > dbrb, with kvm virtual machines using these logical volumes as
> storage).
> > I seem to recall some older messages on drbd list stating that it might
> be
> > OK to have oos blocks for the swap device.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Radu
> >
> >

You don't need Dual-Primary to live migrate - you need shared storage. Two completely different concepts. Now, the shared storage can be based on a DRBD Primary, and you can have it fail over to a DRBD Secondary, but dual primary is not going to do what you want and shared storage will. The storage you share may be virtualized, if you like.


More information about the drbd-user mailing list