Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Are you using active/active channel bonding? If so I'd suggest trying active/passive (or just a single direct connection with no bonding) and see if that helps. If in doubt, simplify... Incidentally, with gigE my experience is that you don't actually need a 'crossover' cable to do direct connection, a normal 'straight' cable works just as well. I think this is because gigE uses all 4 pairs simultaneously in both directions rather than one pair in each direction as 100M does. Chris --------------------------- Christopher Tothill Zone D Senior IT Support Specialist (Chemistry Unix Support) W227, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol Tel: (+44 117 33) 17045 Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk --------------------------- On 27 June 2013 03:12, Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running Intel e1000 with crossover cable, and I just noticed in my log > files I'm getting this: > > [3535162.766591] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down > [3535168.243278] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow > Control: Rx/Tx > [3535168.243282] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO > [3535176.574432] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down > [3535178.495165] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow > Control: Rx/Tx > [3535214.602022] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down > [3535214.602465] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: Reset adapter > [3535239.602540] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow > Control: Rx/Tx > > Interesting. > > Gerald > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "cesar" <brain at click.com.py> > > To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:17 PM > > Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time > > > > Hi Lukas Gradl-4 > > > > I have PVE 2.3 with the same problem > > > > But my NICs are Realtek, and soon i will change of brand for Intel, > > and i > > have connected in crossover-cable mode, because a "Switch" in the > > middle can > > change the data of the packets. > > > > Please answer this questions: > > > > What are the model of your NICs for use with DRBD on each PVE Node? > > > > Do you have the link in crossover-cable mode (ie link NIC to NIC)?, > > if not, > > just do it !!! (DRBD suggested highly do NIC to NIC) > > > > The latest "PVE 2.3" and "PVE 3.x" version have the kernel for > > support DRBD > > 8.3.13, update your PVE and your DRBD and after you must do test. > > After, > > please tell me about of this test. > > > > When i have my new NICs Intel, i will can tell you about of my > > experiences > > > > Best regards > > Cesar > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://drbd.10923.n7.nabble.com/r0-ok-r1-PingAck-did-not-arrive-in-time-tp17953p17960.html > > Sent from the DRBD - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > drbd-user mailing list > > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user > > > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130627/b1472478/attachment.htm>