[DRBD-user] Redundant network connection

Arnold Krille arnold at arnoldarts.de
Mon Jul 25 01:00:40 CEST 2011

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:07:51 Digimer wrote:
> On 07/24/2011 03:48 PM, Lucian Torje wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is it possible to use multiple network connections for the same node -
> > redundant network, in case one fails the other one should be used.
> Using DRBD over a standard bonded connection works fine.

Is there also a way to define two connections on two networks with different 
I am thinking about our future setup and wanna have a user-network and a 
storage-/cluster-network. But when the storage-network fails, the cluster and 
storage is still connected through the user-network and thus should still 
work. I know this is possible with the cluster-part of pacemaker/corosync but 
what about drbd?

Have a nice week,

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20110725/b6110193/attachment.pgp>

More information about the drbd-user mailing list