Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On 02/24/2011 02:27 PM, netz-haut - stephan seitz wrote: > Heading back to my former question, > Is it advisable to split huge storage into smaller chunks? > > > Instead of: > > [ ------------- big LV ------------ ] > [ ------------- big VG ------------ ] [ -> expand later ] > [ ---------- big DRBD PV ---------- ] > / \ > Tgt1 Tgt2 > > > maybe > > [ ------------- big LV ------------ ] > [ ------------- big VG ------------ ] > [ DRBD PV1 ][ DRBD PV2 ] [ DRBD PV3 ] > / \ / \ / \ > Tgt1a Tgt2a 1b 2b 1c 2c > > > ... just wondering if syncing would scale better this way ... Quoting DRBD Total: Don't *ever* create VGs that span multiple DRBD resources. (Don't create such software RAIDs either). What will you do if one of them gets splitbrained or somesuch? Regards, Felix