Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hello, I'm running RHEL 5.5 on two workstation for test DRBD and I get something that sound strange ... ------------ http://www.drbd.org/docs/introduction/ : Protocol C. Synchronous replication protocol. Local write operations on the primary node are considered completed only after both the local and the remote disk write have been confirmed. As a result, loss of a single node is guaranteed not to lead to any data loss. Data loss is, of course, inevitable even with this replication protocol if both nodes (or their storage subsystems) are irreversibly destroyed at the same time. By far, the most commonly used replication protocol in DRBD setups is protocol C. ------------- But, when using 8.3.2 (on both side), and copy a 10Gb (9.6 in fact) file from LOCAL (/) to DRBD0 (mounted under /mnt/), I see that the local copy is finished, but the network transfert is not yet finished and didn't receive the complete file (see the amount of date received by using "iftop") ... See the result of one test : ------------- [0][root at wk01lhe /]$ time cp 10go-random.file /mnt/ real 14m11.318s user 0m1.236s sys 0m49.915s -------------- After 14min11, the network still in use for about 1min15 ... I've made another test : --------- lin1 <= lin2 (lin2 is primary ; lin1 is secondary) --------- * start the copy (from lin2 local to lin2 drbd) * after 14min, when the "cp" command say the copy is finished (from lin2 ; return to the shell), I unplug the network cable and break the connexion * then, set lin1 as primary and mount the filesystem * check the size of the file (which should be the same size because of the use of protocol C and unplug after the "cp" command has successfully finished) I see than the file is missing about 800Mb of data (8.8 and not 9.6Gb)! I don't understand what happening with the C protocol ... Please note that I'm not using a physical partition ... but a loop device ... I know about the risk : this is just for test and I don't think it will impact the network transfert ... --------- /home/laurent/kvm/qemu-kvm_hdd => /dev/loop0 => /dev/drbd0 --------- (same on both side) Any idea ? I've read the "drbd.conf" but have not found any interesting parameter ... The behavior of the C protocol in DRBD 8.3.2 is really strange, isn't ? Here is the configuration used : ------------ [laurent at wk02lhe kvm]$ cat /etc/drbd.conf # last update by loopx on 20100413 : # - update the configuration to be easier with version 8.3 # - creation of this config for 8.0 ################################################################# global { #don't send statistics through internet ... usage-count no; } common { protocol C; } resource r0 { device /dev/drbd0; disk /dev/loop0; meta-disk internal; syncer { rate 10M; } on wk02lhe.hbac.onerva.fgov.be { address <ip1>:7789; } on wk01lhe.hbac.onerva.fgov.be { address <ip2>:7789; } } ------------- Before version 8.3.2, I've try the 8.0 and I don't see this strange behavior .. Note: the file used to test DRBD is a simple generated file with "dd" and "/dev/urandom" ... Note2: before post here, I've post here : -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Strange-replication-using-DRBD-8.3.2-tp28241563p28241563.html Sent from the DRBD - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.