Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
I don't want to compile kernel modules by hand on enterprise distribution. But this wasn't my q. If there is a bug in 8.0.* rpm package i guess it should be fixed. I'm sure Lars will comment on this. :-) Back to the topic, which one should be choosen? I guess 8.0 not until it's fixed? Regards, Martin Schmidt, Torsten wrote: > on RHEL 5.4 x86_64, > > first i installed drbd-8.2.? rpm from a CentOS-Repository but there was a bug in die linbit:ocf concerning master-slave (multi-state) configuration of a stacked device. > > after that i installed drbd-8.3.4 from source, that was easy and it's working well. > Why not use the latest stable release? > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / with kind regards > Torsten Schmidt > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com [mailto:drbd-user-bounces at lists.linbit.com] Im Auftrag von Martin Gombac( > Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Oktober 2009 10:07 > An: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > Betreff: [DRBD-user] 8.0, 8.2 or 8.3? > > Hi, > > i'm setting up XEN active/active cluster on CentOS 5.4. Which version of drbd would you recommend? I would choose 8.0. > > kmod-drbd-xen.x86_64 : drbd kernel module(s) > kmod-drbd82-xen.x86_64 : drbd82 kernel module(s) > kmod-drbd83-xen.x86_64 : drbd83 kernel module(s) > > > Tnx for hints. :-) > Regards, > M. > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user