[DRBD-user] conundrum

[Scott Inderlied]

I pulled the snapshot, unpacked it, and this is what I get on both centos
5.3 servers:
 
[root at xen1 drbd-8.3]# make clean all
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/drbd-8.3/user'
rm -f drbdadm_scanner.c drbdmeta_scanner.c
rm -f drbdsetup drbdadm drbdmeta drbdmeta_unfinished_rewrite *.o
rm -f drbd_buildtag.c drbd_strings.c
rm -f *~
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/drbd-8.3/user'
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/drbd-8.3/scripts'
rm -f *~
rm -f datadisk
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/drbd-8.3/scripts'
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/drbd-8.3/documentation'
To clean the documentation: make doc-clean
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/drbd-8.3/documentation'
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/drbd-8.3/drbd'
rm -rf .tmp_versions
rm -f *.[oas] *.ko .*.cmd .*.d .*.tmp *.mod.c .*.flags .depend .kernel*
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/drbd-8.3/drbd'
rm -f *~
rm -rf dist
make -C drbd drbd_buildtag.c
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/drbd-8.3/drbd'
your DRBD source tree is broken. unpack again.
make[1]: *** [drbd_buildtag.c] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/drbd-8.3/drbd'
make: *** [drbd/drbd_buildtag.c] Error 2
 
 
 
From: Kelvin Leong [mailto:kelvin at zension.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 06:00
To: Scott Inderlied
Cc: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] conundrum
 
Scott,

I think what Ante meant is that the git image has just ask much risk as the
RC2 but just with one extra patch :P

If you're factoring in risk already I suggest you go with what makes you
more comfortable (or what you have worked with before)

Regards,
Kelvin
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Scott Inderlied
<scott at northwestcomputer.biz> wrote:
How much risk does this entail? Is the git image stable enough for
production use?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ante Karamatić [mailto:ivoks at grad.hr]
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 04:23
> To: Scott Inderlied
> Cc: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] conundrum
>
> Scott Inderlied wrote:
>
> > I'm not concerned about whether it will work or not as is. I'd simply
like
> > to take advantage of an advancement if advantages accrue. For me it's
really
> > more of a question of the difficulty upgrading later may pose. If I
install
> > now with the latest stable DRBD and heartbeat2 and wish to upgrade
sometime
> > in the future, will this present great difficulties? I may not want to
> > upgrade with this new release, but probably will at some point (v. 9
> > perhaps), and I wish to avoid as many problems as I can which could
result
> > in downtime.
>
> Since heartbeat2 isn't being developed any more and is, practically,
> being replaced with pacemaker, I'd suggest using pacemaker+openais and
> latest git snapshot of drbd8. git snapshot has only one patch against
> 8.3.2rc2.

_______________________________________________
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20090628/dfa57224/attachment.htm>