Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
> ok. > first, this is NOT a problem. > it is just an "unexpected message". > no harm done. > believe me. > I know what generates that message. > > This is only cosmetic. > > if using the older userland against the newer module, > this had been expected (because the older userland does not expect the > sync_progress information in state answers). > > I thought it would not appear, when using the correct userland against > the newer module. apparently, I'm wrong. > Ok, so I should not be afraid of any side effect. It is just that i am wondering if this is not the tree which hides the forest ;-) > so I'll have a look why the "sync_progress" tag > is not consumed (and thus printf'ed explicitly...) > when using certain state functions during resync. > Well, I will be happy to have a consistent reason. If I can help in any way, tell me. >> What is this node_id file ? >> > > http://www.drbd.org/usage/introduction0/ > Clear ! Thank for all. -- Hervé GAUTIER