Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:44:27AM -0700, Nicholas Dronen wrote: > Hi: > > Does anyone know the reason for the Note on this page about using the > drbddisk RA in Hearbeat V2-style clusters? Why do the DRBD developers > discourage the use of the V2 RA? > > http://wiki.linux-ha.org/DRBD/HowTov2 > > Note: as of 2008-02-15, the DRBD developers recommend to use the > v1 drbddisk RA, > although the v2 DRBD RA has been reported to work by some users > (decide on your own!) when that note was written, multi-state (or master-slave, or whatever you want to call them) resources still did not work (as expected, for me). crm in heartbeat 2.1.4, and most importantly, crm now in pacemaker, improved here. I don't think the "periodically monitoring" is of much use, though, currently. so for a "standard" two-node setup, it does not matter much annymore. it gives you no advantage either way, they just behave different on "stop" or "standby". -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. __ please don't Cc me, but send to list -- I'm subscribed