Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hi, I would use bounding. You have redundancy and throughput at the same time, and transparent for the upper levels applications. Yes put heartbeat and drbd on top of it. I use bounding in almost my clusters setup. No problems at all. Good luck, (I hope you have some good I/O to handle that 10Gbit NIC's) Corey Brown wrote: > I have two Debian servers located in separate buildings. > > They each have 2 x 1 GB NICS that are connected to the local LAN and > 2 x 10 GB Fiber connectors that are connected the other server. > > I propose to use network bonding on the 2 x 1 GB NIC on each server > to the local LAN and use network bonding of the 2 x 10 GB fiber to the > remote server. > > > The bonded 10 GB link would be used for heartbeat, drbd replicating > and LAN to LAN traffic. Some heavy loads may occur due to the nightly > backups. > > > > Should I bond the 10 GB link and run drbd, heartbeat, LAN to LAN > traffic and nightly backups on the same bonded 10 GB ? > > or should I run the drbd and heartbeat separate on their own 10 GB link ? > > > Thx > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user -- _ °v° Igor Neves <igor.neves at 3gnt.net> /(_)\ 3GNTW - Tecnologias de Informação, Lda ^ ^ SIP/JID/MSN: igor at 3gnt.net Mobile Phone: 00351914503611 Local Phone: 00351252377120