Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
José E. Colón wrote: > "Don't you think it is the developers of CentOS who should decide what > goes in it" ummm ... the ubuntu devels decide what is in their distro too. Is it going to be kde 3.5.9 or 4.0.3 ... someone has to make a choice, and they do. > > "...if you want to pay me to maintain it..." > > Whoa! I don't know about others on the list, but this sounds a whole > lot like Microsoft to me. Definitely not in accordance with a > "COMMUNITY Enterprise Operating System," eh? > Ridiculous ... CentOS is free and provides several extra repositories. However, what is being asked for is a custom version with extra support. There is only so many hours in a day to do things for free ... if you want custom stuff, build it yourself or pay for it. > I know it isn't trivial in a production environment, but if you'll > have to spend all that time building stuff from source because The > Community has turned into The Empire, then you might as well switch to > Ubuntu Server and enjoy the vast repositories and superior package > management. ;) > Yep .. now that they have a real SSH, you might be able to keep everybody from getting in. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20080523/3f54d9ff/attachment.pgp>