Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Monday 03 March 2008 09:55:57 Dominik Klein wrote: > >> http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/ch-heartbeat.html > >> R1 can only deal with heartbeat and LSB Resources. OCF Resources are for > >> R2 only. > >> You even say so: > >> http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-xen-heartbeat.html > >> Although - there is a wrapper for R1 that makes it possible to use OCF > >> RAs in R1, but I don't know how to use it and wether that should be > >> stated in this place. > > > > It makes so little sense to do this that we're taking the liberty not to > > include this. :-) > > The wrapper? Okay. > > But you should not state, Heartbeat R1 could handle OCF resources. That > is - out of the box - not possible. Ah, re-reading that section I see what you mean. I thought I had made this clear; in fact I hadn't. Fixed. > >> http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-heartbeat-r1.html > >> "Resource group support is limited to two resource groups" > >> Thats not true. > >> You can have more than two resource groups. It's just that more than 2 > >> groups are internally treated as one large group per node. > > > > OK, then isn't "limited to two resource groups" a reasonable > > simplification for users? > > Of course you are somewhat right, that it can only handle two resource > groups, as it can only handle 2 resource groups ... > > But ... > That does not mean a user can not configure and use more than 2 resource > groups. What heartbeat internally makes of it is nothing the user should > have to deal with. I acknowledge you have a point there, and I agree that we disagree. I'm leaving this as is. :-) > >> http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-heartbeat-dopd.html > >> This does not mention the difference in configurations with stonith > >> enabled. You might at least place a link to the blog here. > > > > I'm not sure I follow you there; please clarify. > > Well okay, the blog didn't mention that either, sorry. > > In general, I think a section about resource fencing is missing. That's > propably what I missed. Um, why? (DRBD) Resource-level fencing is exactly what dopd provides. Perhaps you mean it's _node_ fencing that's missing? With that I agree, but I really don't even want us to get into documenting node fencing with Heartbeat. We'll leave it to the Heartbeat guys to do that -- not least because there are a myriad approaches to follow, depending on the fencing devices being used. Cheers, Florian -- : Florian G. Haas : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH : Vivenotgasse 48, A-1120 Vienna, Austria When replying, there is no need to CC my personal address. I monitor the list on a daily basis. Thank you.