Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 15:39:34 drbd at bobich.net wrote: > >> DRBD doesn't know and doesn't care if your RAID stripe is degraded or > >> optimal. That's a job for something else. The underlying partition for > >> DRBD is either there or isn't. There is nothing inbetween. If you want > >> to fail over when the local RAID stripe is degraded, then you'll have to > >> put in some external monitoring, possibly integrated with heartbeat. So > >> yes, probably a Linux-HA question. > > > > Um, not quite. > > http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-handling-disk-errors.html > > This is about handling disk errors. I was talking about whether the > underlying RAID stripe is degraded or optimal. And would you mind enlightening me how a RAID-0 set (whose use you suggested earlier) ever becomes "degraded" -- rather than faulty and issuing an I/O error -- when losing a disk? Last time I checked, RAID-0 wasn't redundant. Florian -- : Florian G. Haas : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH : Vivenotgasse 48, A-1120 Vienna, Austria When replying, there is no need to CC my personal address. I monitor the list on a daily basis. Thank you.