Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On 2008-12-16 12:03, Martin Winkler wrote: > Am Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:45:51 +0100 > schrieb Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com>: > >> You realize you're breaking an established convention by naming a >> device /dev/drbd0 on one node and /dev/drbd1 on the other, and doing >> the opposite for a different device? > > I didn't know that there is such a convention - and I liked it more to > have the (usually) Primary drbd part on the same drive as the rest of > the operating system. Both nodes usually do different things. Your call -- as I said, don't be surprised if that confuses people. >>> Now my question: Is this difference significant if drbd did not >>> raise any errors? I am feeling a bit uncomfortable here. What >>> should I do to make the same sizes in case there is a problem with >>> my setup? >> What DRBD version are you on? > > The version CentOS is delivering: > drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos > kmod-drbd-8.0.13-2 Please get a kernel module that matches your userland. Florian -- : Florian G. Haas : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH : Vivenotgasse 48, A-1120 Vienna, Austria When replying, there is no need to CC my personal address. I monitor the list on a daily basis. Thank you. DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT.