Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 02:55 -0500, Maurice Volaski wrote: > >I suggest you > ># wget http://svn.drbd.org/drbd/trunk/benchmark/dm.c > ># gcc -O -o dm dm.c > > > >and then to benchmark: > > ./dm -x -a 0 -s 4g -b 20m -m -y -p -o /maurice/bonnie/hello > > Here are the results for the two computers > > primary (faster one) > 29.34 MB/sec (4294967296 B / 02:19.620474) > > secondary (slower one) > 34.57 MB/sec (4294967296 B / 01:58.497313) > > > How can such a fast I/O subsystem as a RAID 6 set of Seagate 750 GB > SATAII (3Gbs) drives off an Areca PCIe controller get such dismal > results? It might be useful to compare the results to a test run directly on the disks, sans DRBD. That way we would know if the slow down is due solely to DRBD and not to a RAID configuration or a particular behavior of the test. Corey -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20061122/5c4dcc45/attachment.pgp>