Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:22:14AM -0600, Nate Reed wrote: > On Friday 10 February 2006 11:06, Luc de Louw wrote: > > Nate Reed wrote: > > > On Friday 10 February 2006 10:51, Pierre Ancelot wrote: > > >> Don't do this, you will corrupt your database. > > >> mysql deals with the database in memory of each node > > >> > > >> Meaning if you do this, > > >> > > >> every node will load database from the files > > >> each node will modify the database in memory. > > > > > > This is not a problem if you only have one active node since you would > > > only run mysql on the active. > > > > Running a MySQL Cluster on a single node makes no sense for me. The > > complexity of MySQL Clusters to set up and maintain is not worth the few > > seconds you win when switching the active node. > > > > Eighter run it on DRBD (Proved working and stable) or test it with > > MySQL-Cluster. > > I must have lost track of the discussion. :) I didn't suggest running MySql > Cluster on a single node. Clearly, one has to choose between 1) MySql > clustering on multiple nodes and 2) using DRBD active/passive with mysql > running on a single node. Not both. and IIRC MySQL-Cluster has to keep the whole database in RAM ? Regards, Paddy -- Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall