Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Friday 10 February 2006 11:06, Luc de Louw wrote: > Nate Reed wrote: > > On Friday 10 February 2006 10:51, Pierre Ancelot wrote: > >> Don't do this, you will corrupt your database. > >> mysql deals with the database in memory of each node > >> > >> Meaning if you do this, > >> > >> every node will load database from the files > >> each node will modify the database in memory. > > > > This is not a problem if you only have one active node since you would > > only run mysql on the active. > > Running a MySQL Cluster on a single node makes no sense for me. The > complexity of MySQL Clusters to set up and maintain is not worth the few > seconds you win when switching the active node. > > Eighter run it on DRBD (Proved working and stable) or test it with > MySQL-Cluster. I must have lost track of the discussion. :) I didn't suggest running MySql Cluster on a single node. Clearly, one has to choose between 1) MySql clustering on multiple nodes and 2) using DRBD active/passive with mysql running on a single node. Not both. > > rgds > > Luc > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user