Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:42:05PM +0200, Martin Peylo wrote: > Dear interested reader, > > I'm trying to use DRBD on *CompactFlash* media. This kind of media is Current flash is not optimized for write-intensive applications. You're risking flash failure, soon. > extremely slow on write (~0,17 MB/s) and slow (~3.4 MB/s) on read - compared > with harddisks. They are formatted with reiserfs - that could explain the > extremely slow writing speed I got by using cp from ramdisk and calculating > the rate. But anyhow CF is very slow compared with harddisks. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20060421/533fb0cc/attachment.pgp>