[DRBD-user] Re: filesystem corruptions

Eugene Crosser crosser at rol.ru
Tue Oct 11 11:35:56 CEST 2005

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

Lars Ellenberg wrote:

>>>>(for now: kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.something, smp, drbd 0.7.11 and
>>>                                              ^^^^^^^^^
>>>But you applied the bio_clone fix, did you?
>>Nope.  Because (1) on other systems, I am running 2.6.10 without that
>>fix without any problem
> as long as there is nothing involved that uses bio clones,
> it does not affect you.
> drbd uses them all the time.

There *is* drbd on the system that runs 2.6.10 kernel *without*
bio_clone() fix.  Works perfectly under rather high load.  Miracle?  Maybe.

>>and (2) bro reported that 2.12.5 which has this
>>fix did not make any difference.
> please double check yourself.

I will make sure to try the same setup with bio_clone() fix applied.  I
do not expect it to make any difference, though, because of the above...
Well, if only bio_clone fix affects SATA but does not affect SCSI?..

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20051011/9a5a71d5/attachment.pgp>

More information about the drbd-user mailing list