Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lars Ellenberg wrote: >>>>(for now: kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.something, smp, drbd 0.7.11 and >>> >>> ^^^^^^^^^ >>> >>>But you applied the bio_clone fix, did you? >> >>Nope. Because (1) on other systems, I am running 2.6.10 without that >>fix without any problem > > > as long as there is nothing involved that uses bio clones, > it does not affect you. > > drbd uses them all the time. There *is* drbd on the system that runs 2.6.10 kernel *without* bio_clone() fix. Works perfectly under rather high load. Miracle? Maybe. >>and (2) bro reported that 2.12.5 which has this >>fix did not make any difference. > > > please double check yourself. I will make sure to try the same setup with bio_clone() fix applied. I do not expect it to make any difference, though, because of the above... Well, if only bio_clone fix affects SATA but does not affect SCSI?.. Eugene -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20051011/9a5a71d5/attachment.pgp>