[DRBD-user] how to avoid Stale NFS file handle with multiple drbds?

Todd Denniston Todd.Denniston at ssa.crane.navy.mil
Mon Dec 12 17:33:02 CET 2005

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.


Todd Denniston wrote:
> Raoul Borenius wrote:
> 
<SNIP>
>> Here ist my haresources with only one data-volume:
>>
>> b1      drbddisk::varlibnfs \
>>         drbddisk::mail \
>>         Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/var/lib/nfs::ext3 \
>>         Filesystem::/dev/drbd1::/srv/nfs/mail::ext3 \
>>         killnfsd \
>>         nfs-common \
>>         nfs-kernel-server \
>>         sleep::3 \
>>         IPaddr::194.95.249.20/24/eth0
>>
>>
>>> If it looks like the drbd failover worked, that is, the /var/lib/nfs
>>> symlink was pointed to drbd0, and drbd0 was there before nfs 
>>> started.. it
>>> may be something else that is causing stales during failover.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Just for clarification:
> You indicate you use a softlink to put the drbd0 filesystem in place of 
> /var/lib/nfs, but above you mount drbd0 at /var/lib/nfs ... which is it, 
> and is it the same on BOTH systems?
> 
> I have several exports, from different drbd managed partitions, with a 
> softlink /var/lib/nfs -> /nfsstate/var/lib/nfs where nfsstate is my 
> drbd0 which until recently did not have problems with stale nfs ... WAIT 
> A MINUTE, now I know why I was seeing stale nfs handles the last time I 
> fell over: after doing an `ls -l /var/lib/nfs`, I see that for some 
> reason the systems have blown away my softlinks and replaced with new 
> boot disk resident directories, must fix. Thanks for the wake up.
> 

Just in case some one else ends up seeing this problem.
What happened was that when I updated to a new nfs-utils rpm in June, it 
overwrote the /var/lib/nfs structure.  So if you use the softlink method keep 
an eye out for nfs rpm updates. :}




More information about the drbd-user mailing list