Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >In any case, your bugs are valid, however I'm happy that all they >amounted to is a) in unlikely paths, and b) annoying log messages and no >data corruption, not even a crash. That's not quite perfect yet, but >already rather close and not a real show-stopper. > > So coming back to my initial posting... :-) As the corruption bugs seem top be gone now.... Could 0.7 be used in a productive environment now? Or if not and as the development process seems to be very very active: Does it make sense to wait some days to see a version that may be used in a productive environment. Thanks in advance -- Daniel Khan