Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 15:14, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > / 2004-04-13 12:31:32 -0400 > \ Tony Willoughby: > > > > Looking through the release history on drbd.org, it seems that 0.6.* is > > under active development. > > Nope. > I was just good at fixing the "last remaining corner cases" :) > > 0.7. is actively developed. > > > What release is considered stable? We are looking to upgrade many of > > our customers and consider stability more important than just about > > anything else. To date, we've been running 0.6.4 and have been pretty > > happy with it. > > I'd say use 0.6.12 > Only new features are sync-group and ko-count. > Rest was bug fixes... > > But, if you did not hit any of those strange deadlock-of-Primary > cases if something goes wrong on the Secondary that have been fixed > since 0.6.4, and you think you won't hit them soonish, ... My main motivation for upgrading is that I think I'd get better support from this list if I was running something more modern. > > > We will be running in IBM 330/335's, > > dual SMP, HIMEM, 10/100 Ethernet, SCSI disks. I should have mentioned it would be running Red Hat 7.3 with a vanilla 2.4.23 kernel. > > Maybe someone else wants to comment from a non-developers view ? > > Lars Ellenberg > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user -- Tony Willoughby ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Broadband Access and Transport Group mailto:tony_willoughby at adc.com