[Drbd-dev] [PATCH 00/17] lru_cache: checkpatch clean ups

[Tobin C. Harding]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 03:13:36PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:33:59AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Checkpatch clean ups for lib/lru_cache.c
> > 
> > This patch set is intended to test the waters as to whether DRBD
> > wants/accepts checkpatch clean ups. I know that many maintainers
> > consider such patches as code churn.
> 
> I'd consider them such.
> Probably nothing wrong with those patches, really,
> though I did not look very closely.
> 
> I'd maybe do this kind of cleanup IF I was to touch the code anyways.

Point noted, thank you.

> > I am taking a look at the DRBD code after bumping into Brian at OSSNA in LA.
> > 
> > If you do want/like checkpatch fixes I am happy to do so for drivers/block/drbd/* while I look
> > around the code base.
> > 
> > I don't know which tree you guys are working off.
> > This series applies on top of Linus' development
> > tree, commit:
> > 
> > a8c964eacb21288b2dbfa9d80cee5968a3b8fb21
> 
> Our "upstream" is out-of-tree still,
> and tries to be compatible with a wide range of kernel.org tree versions.
> We recently move the public master to github.com/LINBIT/drbd-8.4/
> and it looks in some parts quite different from the in kernel code,
> for compatilibity reasons.

cloned.

> But for this kind of cleanup stuff,
> kernel.org master is the right reference, yes.
> 
> As I said, I don't care much for "no-op" commits, and even if I'd take
> them, I'd fold them all into one "fixes for checkpatch complaints".
> 
> But don't let that keep you from "looking around the code base",
> maybe you still spot things that actually need fixing
> or can otherwise be improved.  It's not that we don't like contributors,
> it's just that contributing "white-space only changes" to C code won't
> earn you much points in my book ;-)

Thanks for your comments. Let's consider this set dropped.

thanks,
Tobin