[Drbd-dev] [PATCH] dynamic creation/removal more then 256 drbd
stf_xl at wp.pl
Mon May 7 09:20:49 CEST 2007
On Friday 04 May 2007 14:44, Philipp Reisner wrote:
> But in case I had an application that is in the need for
> many block devices (e.g. a farm of kvm or xen instances...)
> I would put a LVM VG on top of a singe DRBD device.
IMHO creating drbd on top lv's is more flexible then creating vg on top
of drbd, however this depend on overall system design and needs.
> My question is more like: What was your motivation for doing
> this patch ?
Well, my boss want me to do it. My company provide linux based software to
storage servers and some client wont it.
More information about the drbd-dev