[DRBD-user] Using 2 Interfaces for the same drbd device ?
mvolaski at aecom.yu.edu
Tue Aug 28 18:11:32 CEST 2007
>Maurice Volaski wrote:
>> No, this would not work. Bonding is not routing. There was once a
>> discussion here on how this could be accomplished a long while ago using
>> OSPF. It is rather complex. I seem to recall, however, that DRBD+, the
>> commercial version, can do this natively. Correct?
>Did you read my previous post ?
Did you read mine? I said:
"This wouldn't work if the NICs are on different networks, which is
what you'd want to also establish redundancy against switch failure.
Heartbeat, however, has had this ability for a long time, although
that's a way simpler connection."
>bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.10 on box 1
>bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.20 on box 2
>Where is the routing problem ?
Where's the second network?
Maurice Volaski, mvolaski at aecom.yu.edu
Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
More information about the drbd-user