[DRBD-user] Using 2 Interfaces for the same drbd device ?

Maurice Volaski mvolaski at aecom.yu.edu
Tue Aug 28 18:11:32 CEST 2007


>Maurice Volaski wrote:
>>  No, this would not work. Bonding is not routing. There was once a
>>  discussion here on how this could be accomplished a long while ago using
>>  OSPF. It is rather complex. I seem to recall, however, that DRBD+, the
>>  commercial version, can do this natively. Correct?
>
>Did you read my previous post ?
>

Did you read mine? I said:

"This wouldn't work if the NICs are on different networks, which is 
what you'd want to also establish redundancy against switch failure. 
Heartbeat, however, has had this ability for a long time, although 
that's a way simpler connection."


>
>bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.10 on box 1
>bond0 has the ip address 192.168.1.20 on box 2
>
>Where is the routing problem ?

Where's the second network?
-- 

Maurice Volaski, mvolaski at aecom.yu.edu
Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University



More information about the drbd-user mailing list