Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 16:30, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:31:59PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > > +# ifndef MODULE > > > // defined in drbd_main.c, > > > // copied from redhat's kernel-2.4.20-13.9 kernel/signal.c > > > // to avoid a recompile of the redhat kernel > > > inline void recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t); > > > +# endif > > > > This first was in and then was backed out again. > > I think Philipp had a reason to back it out? > > Okay, I'll wait to hear about the problem. I need this (or something to > that effect) to distinguish between modular and monolithic builds. The > SIGHACK must be defined for 2.6 kernels, but the function itself cannot be > multiply defined when doing a monolithic build. > > > > -Packager: > > > +Packager: Lars Ellenberg <l.g.e at web.de> > > > > No Sir. :) > > I'm NOT the packager for "just someone" that happens to say "make rpm". > > Not at all. So I don't like my name in a spec file *template*. > > Well, who wrote the template? :) I went to Ga. Tech. Whenever we needed someone to blame, it was George P. Burdell. http://cyberbuzz.gatech.edu/tbook/traditions/burdell.html I'm sure he would be happy to be the default packager. But I don't know if he has an e-mail address. > Modern RPM requires a valid "packager" > field. And with that, people can just do a straight "rpmbuild -ta > drbd-VERSION.tar.gz" and not mess around.