[DRBD-user] using drbd in a monolithic kernel?
freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com
Wed Mar 24 22:46:59 CET 2004
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 16:30, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:31:59PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > > +# ifndef MODULE
> > > // defined in drbd_main.c,
> > > // copied from redhat's kernel-2.4.20-13.9 kernel/signal.c
> > > // to avoid a recompile of the redhat kernel
> > > inline void recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t);
> > > +# endif
> > This first was in and then was backed out again.
> > I think Philipp had a reason to back it out?
> Okay, I'll wait to hear about the problem. I need this (or something to
> that effect) to distinguish between modular and monolithic builds. The
> SIGHACK must be defined for 2.6 kernels, but the function itself cannot be
> multiply defined when doing a monolithic build.
> > > -Packager:
> > > +Packager: Lars Ellenberg <l.g.e at web.de>
> > No Sir. :)
> > I'm NOT the packager for "just someone" that happens to say "make rpm".
> > Not at all. So I don't like my name in a spec file *template*.
> Well, who wrote the template? :)
I went to Ga. Tech. Whenever we needed someone to blame, it was George
I'm sure he would be happy to be the default packager. But I don't know
if he has an e-mail address.
> Modern RPM requires a valid "packager"
> field. And with that, people can just do a straight "rpmbuild -ta
> drbd-VERSION.tar.gz" and not mess around.
More information about the drbd-user