[DRBD-user] 9.1.14 upgrade issue
nigel at ntalk.ie
Fri Apr 14 13:44:35 CEST 2023
Sorry syntax in email, did a copy and paste of the new update package name from the release email rather than from installed system package names. Actual system installed files are correct though, so the original problem does unfortunately still exist.
$dnf list --installed | grep drbd
drbd90-utils.x86_64 9.23.1-1.el8.elrepo @elrepo
kmod-drbd90.x86_64 9.1.14-1.el8_7.elrepo @elrepo
On 14 April 2023 10:28:42 IST, Akemi Yagi <toracat at elrepo.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 2:18 AM Nigel Phillips <nigel at ntalk.ie> wrote:
>> AlmaLinux 8.7, kernel 4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7.x86_64
>> Just installed kmod-drbd9x-9.1.14-1.el9_1.elrepo.x86_64.rpm on my
>> secondary and after a reboot was greeted with a
>> drbdadm status
>> r0 role:Secondary
>> Looking at /proc/drbd I noticed it still had the previous version listed
>> cat /proc/drbd
>> version: 9.1.13 (api:2/proto:86-121)
>> GIT-hash: 834511a4957bba1a6aa4245a99ceebca5c42a4f2 build by
>> mockbuild@, 2023-01-30 18:33:50
>> Transports (api:18):
>> Rebooting again into an earlier kernel, 4.18.0-425.13.1.el8_7.x86_64 and
>> now back and working with /proc/drbd showing the correct version.
>> cat /proc/drbd
>> version: 9.1.14 (api:2/proto:86-121)
>> GIT-hash: df55dfb7a93484b7d7eb0c4deac62d887cfcbf67 build by mockbuild@,
>> 2023-04-08 19:54:28
>> Transports (api:18): tcp (9.1.14)
>> Did I miss a step on the upgrade, should I have brought drbd down first
>> (it was set to secondary) or intitally booted into an earlier kernel first
>> before the upgrade?
>> Best Regards,
>You installed the kmod package built for el9 on your el8 system. Please try
>installing kmod-drbd90 for el8.
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the drbd-user