[DRBD-user] How long does it take OOS to clear
G C
gcstang at gmail.com
Mon Oct 21 22:36:39 CEST 2019
Is there anything that will force the OOS to push what is out of sync?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:00 AM Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
> Tuning is quite instance-specific. I would always suggest starting by
> commenting out all tuning, see how it behaves, then tune. Premature
> optimization never is.
>
> digimer
>
> On 2019-10-21 1:31 p.m., G C wrote:
> > Would any of these values being changed help or would it need to be the
> > actual speed between the two nodes that needs to be increased?
> >
> > disk {
> > on-io-error detach;
> > c-plan-ahead 10;
> > c-fill-target 24M;
> > c-min-rate 80M;
> > c-max-rate 720M;
> > }
> > net {
> > protocol A;
> > max-buffers 36k;
> > sndbuf-size 1024k;
> > rcvbuf-size 2048k;
> > }
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:10 AM Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca
> > <mailto:lists at alteeve.ca>> wrote:
> >
> > I assumed it wasn't paused, but that confirms it.
> >
> > Protocol A allows for out of sync to grow. It says "when the data in
> on
> > the network buffer to send to the peer, consider the write
> complete". As
> > such, data that hasn't made it over to the peer causes oos to climb.
> If
> > you have a steady write rate that is faster than your transmit
> > bandwidth, then seeing fairly steady OOS makes sense.
> >
> > To "fix" it, you need to increase the connection speed to the peer
> node.
> > Or, less likely, if the peer's disk is slower than the bandwidth
> > connecting it, speed up the disk write speed.
> >
> > In either case, what you are seeing is not a surprise, and it's not a
> > problem with DRBD. The only other option is to use protocol C, so
> that a
> > write isn't complete until it reaches the peer, but that will slow
> down
> > the write performance of the primary node to be whatever speed you
> have
> > to the peer. That's likely unacceptable.
> >
> > In short, you have a hardware/resource issue.
> >
> > digimer
> >
> > On 2019-10-21 12:19 p.m., G C wrote:
> > > version: 8.4.10
> > > Ran the resume-sync all and received:
> > > 0: Failure: (135) Sync-pause flag is already cleared
> > > Command 'drbdsetup-84 resume-sync 0' terminated with exit code 10
> > >
> > > Protocol used is 'A', our systems are running on a cloud
> environment.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:09 AM Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca
> > <mailto:lists at alteeve.ca>
> > > <mailto:lists at alteeve.ca <mailto:lists at alteeve.ca>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > 8.9.2 is the utils version, what is the kernel module version?
> > > (8.3.x/8.4.x/9.0.x)?
> > >
> > > It's possible something paused sync, but I doubt it. You can
> try
> > > 'drbdadm resume-sync all'. The oos number should change
> > constantly, any
> > > time a block changes it should go up and every time a block
> > syncs it
> > > should go down.
> > >
> > > What protocol are you using? A, B or C?
> > >
> > > digimer
> >
> >
> > --
> > Digimer
> > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/
> > "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of
> > Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal
> talent
> > have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." - Stephen Jay
> > Gould
> >
>
>
> --
> Digimer
> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/
> "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of
> Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent
> have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." - Stephen Jay Gould
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20191021/1567ba0f/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the drbd-user
mailing list