[DRBD-user] The problem about 'susp_fen'

Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenberg at linbit.com
Wed Oct 19 09:52:33 CEST 2016

Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:45:56AM +0000, Zhong, Fu wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> the version of drbd : 8.4 or 9.0.4
> environment: two nodes with status uptodate(name:node1,node2).
> step1:execute ‘drbdadm down resource' at node2
> step2:execute 'drbdadm primary resource --force' at node1

If you use force, you usually override any safety features.
So why would you do that, unless you mean it?

> after step1,step2
> I want to know if the IO would be suspend by fencing at node1?

: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
: DRBD -- Heartbeat -- Corosync -- Pacemaker

DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT
please don't Cc me, but send to list -- I'm subscribed

More information about the drbd-user mailing list