Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
If it doesn't work, let me know. I'll be around for another hour or two. digimer On 22/04/16 12:35 AM, Takeshi Yahagi wrote: > Hi, Digimer > > This is Yahagi(TGI). > > Thanks for your advice!! > >> Try: >> >> drbdadm secondary <res> >> drbdadm disconnect <res> >> drbdadm detach <res> >> >> Note that, in your post below, it is already disconnected (StandAlone == > disconnected), so technically you >> should skip that call. > Yes. I will try it!! > > Thanks !! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Digimer [mailto:lists at alteeve.ca] > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 1:24 PM > To: Takeshi Yahagi <yahagi at tgi.co.jp>; drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] How to detach the DRBD Block Device. > > Try: > > drbdadm secondary <res> > drbdadm disconnect <res> > drbdadm detach <res> > > Note that, in your post below, it is already disconnected (StandAlone == > disconnected), so technically you should skip that call. > > digimer > > On 22/04/16 12:22 AM, Takeshi Yahagi wrote: >> Hi, Digimer >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> >>> Can you paste the output of 'cat /proc/drbd' from the machine you are >> trying to detach? If the peer is not >>> UpToDate and Primary, then it needs the local machine to run. (Just a >> guess, /proc/drbd will give better >>> indication). >> I did it. The output on console is below!! >> [root#] cat /proc/drbd >> : <trim> >> 0: cs:StandAlone ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/DUnknown r----- >> ns:138734606 nr:0 dw:1715987995 dr:1159763787 al:31373043 >> bm:12020785 >> lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:f oos:1740 >> : <trim> >> >> It seems to be "Primary UpToDate". >> >> Regards, >> ---- >> Yahagi(TGI) >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Digimer [mailto:lists at alteeve.ca] >> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 12:16 PM >> To: Takeshi Yahagi <yahagi at tgi.co.jp>; drbd-user at lists.linbit.com >> Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] How to detach the DRBD Block Device. >> >> On 21/04/16 10:15 PM, Takeshi Yahagi wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> This is Yahagi(TGI). >>> >>> I use DRBD v8.3.15, now. >>> >>> I want to detach the DRBD lower device. >>> >>> But, command >>> "drbdadm disconnect <DRBD device> >>> drbdadm detach <DRBD device>" >>> is not success. >>> >>> Error Message from the command "drbdadm detach" is below >>> 0: State change failed: (-2) Need access to UpToDate data Command >>> 'drbdsetup 0 detach' terminated with exit code 17 >>> >>> I want to know the completed command sequence for detach the block > device. >>> >>> Regards, >>> ---- >>> Yahagi(TGI) >>> ---- >> >> Can you paste the output of 'cat /proc/drbd' from the machine you are >> trying to detach? If the peer is not UpToDate and Primary, then it >> needs the local machine to run. (Just a guess, /proc/drbd will give better > indication). >> >> madi >> >> -- >> Digimer >> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer >> is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? >> > > > -- > Digimer > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is > trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? > -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?