Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Claudio, et al; I'm not rushing to the defense of various parties, but I've been actively engaged in testing 9.0.x since its initial release and yes, its been a bear to make it become stable. However the rewards out weigh the troubles, a fully engaged mesh is very powerful approach and auto-promote makes it so much easier than traditional ocf. If you're doing 2 node ha configurations, then drbd9 really isnt for you, its power is in multi-node, and its higher throughput with the new networking stacks and auto-promote. If you do want to realize the benefits and continue down the path, I'd recommend going to top-of-tree and building 9.0.1++, I have seen a quite a few fixes that the readme glosses over, and that may help you progress. Regards -Chuck On 4/11/2016 3:08 AM, Jean-Laurent Ivars wrote: > Hi Claudio, > > I wonder the same as you and I’m a little bit afraid about the > production ready thing… > > I am wondering about downgrading my whole Proxmox installation to have > a stable system rather than using something that can brake any day > with a simple update… Do you think the version 4 features worth the > risk and I should go your way ? > > Thank you for your answer again > Best regards, > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *Jean-Laurent Ivars * > *Responsable Technique | Technical Manager* > 22, rue Robert - 13007 Marseille > Tel: 09 84 56 64 30 - Mobile: 06.52.60.86.47 > Linkedin <http://fr.linkedin.com/in/jlivars/> | Viadeo > <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/jean-laurent.ivars> | > www.ipgenius.fr <https://www.ipgenius.fr> > > >> Le 11 avr. 2016 à 10:13, Claudio Nicora <claudio.nicora at gmail.com >> <mailto:claudio.nicora at gmail.com>> a écrit : >> >> Welcome aboard, and thanks for bringing back an issue that nobody >> took care of since now. >> It means I was not the alone... >> >> I've had the same issue a few months ago, I've reported it here (and >> on Proxmox forums) but the issue is still there. >> >> Linbit: nobody took care of it (however it's a kernel crash, should >> be critical enough...) >> Proxmox: a kernel with an updated DRBD module (still DRBD 9.0) was >> released but the issue persisted. Still wondering how a >> "non-production ready" feature could end up in a "production ready" >> bundle like Proxmox 4 without a choice to get DRBD 8.4 back. >> >> I've sorted it out by downgrading DRBD module to 8.4 and building the >> kernel module + DRBD tools on my own. >> This is the post on Proxmox forum with a backlink to my blog post >> where I detailed the actions to downgrade the module. >> I've also set up a script to run after each Proxmox kernel upgrade, >> just in case. >> >> PS: still waiting for a feedback from Linbit/Proxmox guys ;) >> _______________________________________________ >> drbd-user mailing list >> drbd-user at lists.linbit.com <mailto:drbd-user at lists.linbit.com> >> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20160411/4f5a0b14/attachment.htm>