Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Thank you Lars as that allow me to install the utils with no error.
So I then moved onto the km and tried both v8.4 and v9.0 with different results:
rpm -Uvh drbd-utils-8.9.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm drbd-km-3.10.0_229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64-8.4.6-1.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
drbd-utils = 8.4.6 is needed by drbd-km-3.10.0_229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64-8.4.6-1.x86_64
rpm -Uvh kmod-drbd-9.0.0_3.10.0_229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
Preparing... ################################# [100%]
file /lib/modules/3.10.0-229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64/modules.devname from install of kmod-drbd-9.0.0_3.10.0_229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64-1.el7.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kernel-3.10.0-229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64
file /lib/modules/3.10.0-229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64/modules.softdep from install of kmod-drbd-9.0.0_3.10.0_229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64-1.el7.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kernel-3.10.0-229.el7.centos.uxbod.x86_64
I guess the later error is due to it being such a new release but using the v8.4 branch I was surprised it complained as I though drbd-utils-8.9.3 was compatible for both v8.4 and v9.0 ?
Thanks, Phil
----- On 14 Jul, 2015, at 21:04, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenberg at linbit.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:22:11PM +0000, Wieck, Owen wrote:
>>
>> It appears that you already have drbd-utils installed. You might want
>> to use "rpm -Uvh <list_of_rpms>" instead?
>>
>> --OLW
>
> 24k in ms-tnef winmail.dat for the above ~100 byte? really?
>
> -> Owen, if it is not too much to ask, please configure your MUA to use
> plain text when posting to mailing lists, and preferably get rid of the
> disclaimer as well...
>
> To the OP: if you get conflicts for
> /sbin/something with /usr/sbin/something
> for DIY drbd-utils packages here,
> then that is because we used to live in /usr/sbin,
> then moved to /sbin/ (or the other way around), and to not break
> existing hard-coded scripts, usually ship symlinks.
>
> But that causes problems if your platform already chose to have
> /sbin itself be a symlink to /usr/sbin, as newer fedora and RHEL 7 does.
>
> You can chose to build our packages --without sbinsymlinks (or similar,
> look into the spec file for the exact spelling).
>
> Lars
>
> _______________________________________________
> drbd-user mailing list
> drbd-user at lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
(null)