Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hey there, Ih have found out one issue, the Problem was or better still is a defunced mainboard. I'm running an Adaptec 6504e on a Supermicro A1ASI-2750 the Mainboard occures some strange timeouts, which hasn't been reported by the aacraid driver because they were to short. But suddenly after a few days the timeouts getting larger.. and some other strange things happened linke the uefi bios doesn't detect the card etc. Anyway, I'm still fighting with the pacemakersetup, I do not understand the drbd documentation, the configs shown on one chapter doesn't match the resources in another chapter... Still if somebody knows where I could find a complete configuration made with the pcs programm for pacemaker. I would be so happy. BR 2015-02-04 10:07 GMT+01:00 Patrick Prilisauer <prilisauer at googlemail.com>: > Hello to all, > > I have now completely reinstalled my servers according > https://alteeve.ca/w/AN!Cluster_Tutorial_2 on Centos 7 modified by some > OS differences. > Anyway, it seems that I won't understand what I'm doing wrong? > As you could see res_drbd_1_stop on.... 'not installed' is returned. The > last whole day spending on findinding my needle in the haystack wont make > it better. > > Any hints?, > Thanks > > > > OUTPUT1: > crm_mon > Last updated: Wed Feb 4 09:59:01 2015 > Last change: Wed Feb 4 05:18:41 2015 via crmd on at01srv01 > Stack: corosync > Current DC: at01srv02 (167772162) - partition with quorum > Version: 1.1.10-32.el7_0.1-368c726 > 2 Nodes configured > 4 Resources configured > > > Node at01srv01 (167772161): standby > Online: [ at01srv02 ] > > Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd_1 [res_drbd_1] > res_drbd_1 (ocf::linbit:drbd): FAILED at01srv02 (unmanaged) > Stopped: [ at01srv01 ] > stonith_fence_pcmk_1 (stonith:fence_pcmk): Started at01srv02 > > Failed actions: > res_drbd_1_stop_0 on at01srv02 'not installed' (5): call=120, > status=complete, last-rc-change='Wed Feb 4 09:3 > 5:43 2015', queued=15118ms, exec=0ms > > > > > OUTPUT2: > [root at at01srv02 linbit]# systemctl status drbd.service > drbd.service - DRBD -- please disable. Unless you are NOT using a cluster > manager. > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/drbd.service; disabled) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mit 2015-02-04 09:57:06 CET; > 2min 51s ago > Process: 8544 ExecStart=/sbin/drbdadm adjust-with-progress all > (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) > Process: 8540 ExecStartPre=/sbin/drbdadm sh-nop (code=exited, > status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 8544 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) > > Feb 04 09:57:06 at01srv02 drbdadm: [ > Feb 04 09:57:06 at01srv02 drbdadm: adjust net: > r0:failed(net-options:20) > Feb 04 09:57:06 at01srv02 drbdadm: ] > Feb 04 09:57:06 at01srv02 systemd: drbd.service: main process exited, > code=exited, status=1/FAILURE > Feb 04 09:57:06 at01srv02 systemd: Failed to start DRBD -- please > disable. Unless you are NOT using a c...ger.. > Feb 04 09:57:06 at01srv02 systemd: Unit drbd.service entered failed > state. > Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. > > > > > > > 2015-02-02 20:46 GMT+01:00 Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >> On 02/02/15 02:44 PM, Ivan wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm not sure that two (or more) LUKS partitions are identical given >>>>> exactly the same cleartext content and the same keys. There must be >>>>> some >>>>> kind of sector randomization when writing data to make cryptoanalysis >>>>> harder, so it makes me think that it's not the case (that would require >>>>> testing though). >>>>> If I'm right, I don't see how DRBD could work in that setup. (or maybe >>>>> I >>>>> just need more sleep). >>>>> >>>> >>>> LUKS is working on the LV, which will be backed by the PV on DRBD. DRBD >>>> doesn't know data, so it will simply replicate the LUKS structure >>>> faithfully to both nodes. >>>> >>>> Remember, for all intent and purpose, there is only one device/luks >>>> partition. DRBD is really no different from LUKS on /dev/mdX devices in >>>> this regard. >>>> >>> >>> ah that's right - indeed more sleep needed. I've skipped the "clustered >>> LVM" part and was thinking about two luks partitions. >>> >>> sorry for the noise. >>> >> >> No worries at all. When you ask a question like this, you have a chance >> to learn a system better, so it's good. :) >> >> -- >> Digimer >> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ >> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without >> access to education? >> _______________________________________________ >> drbd-user mailing list >> drbd-user at lists.linbit.com >> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20150209/049c91d3/attachment.htm>