[DRBD-user] Pacemaker cluster: drbdadm: Unknown command 'syncer'

[Lars Ellenberg]

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:17:26AM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to setup drbd on two Centos 7 systems and while the manual
> init of drbd went fine once I try to start drbd using pacemaker I get an
> error in the logs:
> 
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 kernel: drbd: initialized. Version: 8.4.6
> (api:1/proto:86-101)
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 kernel: drbd: GIT-hash:
> 833d830e0152d1e457fa7856e71e11248ccf3f70 build by phil at Build64R7,
> 2015-04-10 05:13:52
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 kernel: drbd: registered as block device major 147
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 drbd(drbd)[1828]: ERROR: r0: Called drbdadm -c
> /etc/drbd.conf syncer r0
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 drbd(drbd)[1828]: ERROR: r0: Exit code 1
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 drbd(drbd)[1828]: ERROR: r0: Command output:
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 lrmd[6083]: notice: operation_finished:
> drbd_start_0:1828:stderr [ This command will ignore resource names! ]
> Aug  3 04:08:48 nfs1 lrmd[6083]: notice: operation_finished:
> drbd_start_0:1828:stderr [ drbdadm: Unknown command 'syncer' ]
> 
> The r0 resource has two volumes. I found one reference to syncer in the
> linbit OCF script even though drbdadm has no such command?
> But even then according to the code this should only be called if
> $DRBD_HAS_MULTI_VOLUME is false.
> Any ideas what is going on here?

You are using drbd utils 8.9.3 as tagged,
which has a broken pacemaker integration script.
Please use 8.9.3-2.

If you built your own packages, rebuild.
If you got them from some "vendor", complain to that vendor.
If you got them from LINBIT (does not look like it;
also I'm pretty sure we did not put out broken packages
in customer visible repos), complain to us.

Cheers,

-- 
: Lars Ellenberg
: http://www.LINBIT.com | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD, Linux-HA  and  Pacemaker support and consulting

DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
__
please don't Cc me, but send to list   --   I'm subscribed