Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:01:59PM +0200, Christian Koschmieder wrote: > Hello! > > I found the problem. > Even though i created the partitions underlying the DRBD with > exactly the same size as on the old server and the still running Verify that. Check "cat /proc/partitions" > primary it seems to have been too small. > Maybe the newer version of drbd uses more space for the meta data? Certainly not. > But what made it difficult to find was that although nearly all log > messages went to /var/log/messages, the vital message only went to > the syslog: Please do not ugly-wrap log lines. > block drbd1: conn( StandAlone -> Unconnected ) > block drbd1: Starting receiver thread (from drbd1_worker ) > block drbd1: receiver (re)started > block drbd1: conn( Unconnected -> WFConnection ) > block drbd1: Handshake successful: Agreed network protocol version 91 > block drbd1: conn( WFConnection -> WFReportParams ) > block drbd1: Starting asender thread (from drbd1_receiver ) > block drbd1: data-integrity-alg: <not-used> > block drbd1: The peer's disk size is too small! That's an "error" level message. It should go to where your syslog is configured to record kern.err level messages. > block drbd1: conn( WFReportParams -> Disconnecting ) > block drbd1: error receiving ReportSizes, l: 32! > block drbd1: asender terminated > block drbd1: Terminating drbd1_asender > block drbd1: Connection closed > block drbd1: conn( Disconnecting -> StandAlone ) > block drbd1: receiver terminated > block drbd1: > > After resizing the partitions everythings running smoothly. Cheers, Lars -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. __ please don't Cc me, but send to list -- I'm subscribed