Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
what about unison? http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ two fileservers, each end of the 10Mb line, and the users just connect to the local fileserver. changes on either side are automatically replicated, conflicts are detected and displayed. looks a bit more end user (personal user) targeted so not sure how it'll stand up to enterprise level abuse. might still want to consider using a clustered filesystem though, even on 1 side of the line there might be more than one user trying to edit a file simultaneously. On 9 December 2014 at 15:50, Christian Völker <chrischan at knebb.de> wrote: > Hi Lars again, > > look for nfs + fscache maybe. > > At least its intended use case is "almost" what you apparently want. > This looks interesting, yes. > > I guess it still will slow down any writes on the remote because of > locking and data transfer. But on the main site it will keep all things > smoothly. > So for the minor site it will be the same: NFS mount with fscache will > speed up local file read, but not writes > major site: reads will be fast as writes will be. > > I will go and play a little bit with the fscache stuff- see if there is > a timeout value which will throw away cache at some stage. > > Thanks again for ideas! > > Greetings > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > drbd-user mailing list > drbd-user at lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20141209/47e78bbc/attachment.htm>