Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Hi, I don't think is related to bonding, I've tried that using just 1 NIC, and the problem still exist. Usually is those none active drbd partition will get disconnect/reconnect,so yes, the more partition you add the more you see. By the way, Ubuntu 13.04 is using DRBD 8.4.2, not sure it will sync with 8.3.x or not. >________________________________ > From: Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com> >To: Chris Tothill <Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk> >Cc: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com >Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:57 AM >Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time > > > >Hi, > >>________________________________ > >From: "Chris Tothill" <Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk> >>To: drbd-user at lists.linbit.com >>Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:42:54 AM >>Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] r0 ok, r1 PingAck did not arrive in time >> >> >>Are you using active/active channel bonding? If so I'd suggest trying active/passive (or just a single direct connection with no bonding) and see if that helps. If in doubt, simplify... >> >> >>Incidentally, with gigE my experience is that you don't actually need a 'crossover' cable to do direct connection, a normal 'straight' cable works just as well. I think this is because gigE uses all 4 pairs simultaneously in both directions rather than one pair in each direction as 100M does. >> >> >>Chris >> >> >> >>--------------------------- >>Christopher Tothill >>Zone D Senior IT Support Specialist (Chemistry Unix Support) >>W227, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol >>Tel: (+44 117 33) 17045 >>Chris.Tothill at bristol.ac.uk >>--------------------------- >> >> >>On 27 June 2013 03:12, Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com> wrote: >> >>Hi, >>> >>>I'm running Intel e1000 with crossover cable, and I just noticed in my log files I'm getting this: >>> >>>[3535162.766591] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down >>>[3535168.243278] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx >>>[3535168.243282] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO >>>[3535176.574432] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down >>>[3535178.495165] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx >>>[3535214.602022] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Down >>>[3535214.602465] e1000e 0000:02:00.0: eth1: Reset adapter >>>[3535239.602540] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx >>> >>>Interesting. >>> >>> >>>Gerald >>> >>> >>> >>I'm sticking with active/passive, and a double of check of my cable shows it to be a regular one, nothing special about it. > >drbd0 pings/acks just fine, it's only drbd1 that fails, once or twice a day, at irregular times. Will it get worse if I add a third drbd resource to the same box? > >Gerald > >_______________________________________________ >drbd-user mailing list >drbd-user at lists.linbit.com >http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/attachments/20130627/4c8241fc/attachment.htm>