Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
Having a LVM setup with about 50 partition already in use I've tried to setup
drbd with external meta-data.
I created a new logical volume /dev/vg0/lvdrbd with 20G (I think it's more
then enough!?):
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/vg0/lvdrbd
VG Name vg0
LV UUID ERwJml-5DQT-B11M-dd1E-nMgx-Fh5r-vmTrPu
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 12
LV Size 20.00 GiB
Current LE 5120
Segments 1
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors auto
- currently set to 1024
Block device 253:57
Whenever I've got the time, I add a partition to the running drbd-config:
resource lv28 {
device minor 28;
disk /dev/vg0/lv28;
meta-disk /dev/vg0/lvdrbd[28];
on keller {
address 192.168.6.3:7728;
}
on schrank {
address 192.168.6.4:7728;
}
}
so that all external meta-data of all partitions will be on /dev/vg0/lvdrbd
man drbd.conf:
"You can use a single block device to store meta-data of multiple DRBD
devices. E.g. use meta-disk /dev/sde6[0]; and meta-disk /dev/sde6[1]; for
two different resources. In this case the meta-disk would need to be at
least 256 MB in size."
When I submit
drbdadm create-md lv28
the output SOMETIMES is like
md_offset 4026531840
al_offset 4026535936
bm_offset 4026568704
Found some data
==> This might destroy existing data! <==
Do you want to proceed?
[need to type 'yes' to confirm] yes
Writing meta data...
initializing activity log
NOT initialized bitmap
New drbd meta data block successfully created.
success
It is SOMETIMES, not always, but I'm getting nervous about it...
Can anyone tell me, what I'm doing wrong??
Is it ok to use meta-disk /dev/vg0/lvdrbd[28]; and meta-disk
/dev/vg0/lvdrbd[5]; for the next partition or must the index be counted up??
Thanks in advance
isy
--
View this message in context: http://drbd.10923.n7.nabble.com/One-large-partition-for-external-meta-data-tp17400.html
Sent from the DRBD - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.