Note: "permalinks" may not be as permanent as we would like,
direct links of old sources may well be a few messages off.
>> resync-rate 200M; > Uhm, what? That's more than your link can do. You want to max this at > 30% of your maximum throughput, tops. Otherwise the resync may interfere > with on-line write performance. > >> al-extents 389; > Why? This should be chosen to be as large (a prime number) as possible. Sorry, remainders of some experiments to overcome the trouble (idea was to de-limit synchronization bandwith and to limit the number of hot extents). I just return them to their defaults (removed assignmend) and tried again - same result. In a second experment, I limited the resync to 20M and increased the al extends to 3389 as stated in the doc. There is absolutely no change in behavior - still lots of ProtocolErrors. I have almost forgotten the tuning approach for now - I am much more scared about stability and data integrity due to the obvious protocol desynchronizations... Regards, Holger